EKS Resiliency and High Availability
サポート対象バージョン: EKS 1.28+, Istio 1.20+, Karpenter 1.0+ 最終更新: February 23, 2026
Resiliency Overview
Resiliency(レジリエンシー)とは、障害発生時の影響を最小化しながら通常状態へ復旧する、または service を維持する能力です。これは単純な high availability (HA) を超えるものであり、障害を予測して備える design philosophy を表します。
Resiliency Maturity Model
| Level | Name | Scope | Key Technologies | RTO Target |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Basic | Pod | Probes, Resource Limits, PDB | Minutes |
| 2 | Multi-AZ | Availability Zone | Topology Spread, ARC Zonal Shift | Seconds |
| 3 | Cell-Based | Service Unit | Shuffle Sharding, Cell Router | Seconds (partial) |
| 4 | Multi-Region | Region | Global Accelerator, Data Replication | Near Zero |
すべての services に Level 4 が必要なわけではありません。SLA requirements、regulations、budget に基づいて適切な Level を選択してください。
Level 1: Basic Resiliency (Pod Level)
Liveness/Readiness/Startup Probes
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
name: web-app
spec:
replicas: 3
selector:
matchLabels:
app: web-app
template:
metadata:
labels:
app: web-app
spec:
containers:
- name: app
image: web-app:1.0
ports:
- containerPort: 8080
startupProbe:
httpGet:
path: /healthz
port: 8080
failureThreshold: 30
periodSeconds: 10
livenessProbe:
httpGet:
path: /healthz
port: 8080
initialDelaySeconds: 0
periodSeconds: 10
failureThreshold: 3
readinessProbe:
httpGet:
path: /ready
port: 8080
periodSeconds: 5
failureThreshold: 3
resources:
requests:
cpu: "250m"
memory: "256Mi"
limits:
cpu: "500m"
memory: "512Mi"PodDisruptionBudget (PDB)
PDB は voluntary disruptions 中の最小 availability を保証します。
apiVersion: policy/v1
kind: PodDisruptionBudget
metadata:
name: web-app-pdb
spec:
# Method 1: Minimum available Pods
minAvailable: 2
# Method 2: Maximum unavailable Pods (use only one)
# maxUnavailable: 1
selector:
matchLabels:
app: web-app# Check PDB status
kubectl get pdb web-app-pdb
# NAME MIN AVAILABLE MAX UNAVAILABLE ALLOWED DISRUPTIONS AGE
# web-app-pdb 2 N/A 1 5mGraceful Shutdown
spec:
terminationGracePeriodSeconds: 60
containers:
- name: app
lifecycle:
preStop:
exec:
command: ["/bin/sh", "-c", "sleep 5"]
preStopで5秒待機する理由: endpoint removal の伝播前に Pod が終了すると、traffic loss が発生します。この sleep により伝播時間を確保します。
Level 2: Multi-AZ Strategy
Pod Topology Spread Constraints
Pods を availability zones 全体に均等に分散します。
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
name: web-app
spec:
replicas: 6
selector:
matchLabels:
app: web-app
template:
metadata:
labels:
app: web-app
spec:
topologySpreadConstraints:
# Hard constraint: Maximum 1 difference between AZs
- maxSkew: 1
topologyKey: topology.kubernetes.io/zone
whenUnsatisfiable: DoNotSchedule
labelSelector:
matchLabels:
app: web-app
minDomains: 3
# Soft constraint: Even distribution across nodes
- maxSkew: 1
topologyKey: kubernetes.io/hostname
whenUnsatisfiable: ScheduleAnyway
labelSelector:
matchLabels:
app: web-app
containers:
- name: app
image: web-app:1.0| Parameter | Description |
|---|---|
maxSkew | topology domains 間の Pod 数の最大差 |
topologyKey | 分散の基準 (zone, hostname など) |
whenUnsatisfiable | DoNotSchedule (Hard) または ScheduleAnyway (Soft) |
minDomains | domains の最小数 (3 AZs の場合は 3) |
Karpenter Multi-AZ NodePool
apiVersion: karpenter.sh/v1
kind: NodePool
metadata:
name: default
spec:
template:
spec:
requirements:
- key: topology.kubernetes.io/zone
operator: In
values: ["ap-northeast-2a", "ap-northeast-2b", "ap-northeast-2c"]
- key: karpenter.sh/capacity-type
operator: In
values: ["on-demand", "spot"]
- key: node.kubernetes.io/instance-type
operator: In
values: ["m6i.xlarge", "m6i.2xlarge", "m7i.xlarge", "m7i.2xlarge"]
disruption:
consolidationPolicy: WhenEmptyOrUnderutilized
budgets:
- nodes: "20%" # Maximum 20% disrupted simultaneously
- nodes: "0"
schedule: "0 9 * * 1-5" # No disruption during business hours
duration: 8hARC Zonal Shift
AWS Application Recovery Controller (ARC) Zonal Shift は、障害が発生している AZ から traffic を自動的にリダイレクトします。
# Start Zonal Shift (manual)
aws arc-zonal-shift start-zonal-shift \
--resource-identifier arn:aws:elasticloadbalancing:ap-northeast-2:123456789012:loadbalancer/app/my-alb/abc123 \
--away-from ap-northeast-2a \
--expires-in 1h \
--comment "AZ-a experiencing issues"
# Enable Zonal Autoshift (automatic)
aws arc-zonal-shift create-practice-run-configuration \
--resource-identifier $ALB_ARN \
--outcome-alarms '[{"alarmIdentifier": {"alarmName": "my-alarm", "region": "ap-northeast-2"}, "type": "CLOUDWATCH"}]'Storage Considerations
EBS AZ Lock-in Issues の防止:
apiVersion: storage.k8s.io/v1
kind: StorageClass
metadata:
name: ebs-sc
provisioner: ebs.csi.aws.com
volumeBindingMode: WaitForFirstConsumer # Create volume after Pod scheduling
parameters:
type: gp3EFS による Cross-AZ Access:
apiVersion: storage.k8s.io/v1
kind: StorageClass
metadata:
name: efs-sc
provisioner: efs.csi.aws.com
parameters:
provisioningMode: efs-ap
fileSystemId: fs-12345
directoryPerms: "700"Istio Locality-Aware Routing
同じ AZ 内の traffic を優先すると、cross-AZ transfer costs を 60-80% 削減できます。
apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1
kind: DestinationRule
metadata:
name: web-app-dr
spec:
host: web-app.default.svc.cluster.local
trafficPolicy:
outlierDetection:
consecutive5xxErrors: 5
interval: 30s
baseEjectionTime: 30s
connectionPool:
tcp:
maxConnections: 100
# Locality-aware routing is handled automatically by Istio
# Based on Pod's topology.kubernetes.io/zone labelLevel 3: Cell-Based Architecture
Cell Concept
Cell は 独自の data store、cache、queue を持つ self-contained service unit です。障害の blast radius を特定の Cell に分離します。
Cell Partitioning Strategies
| Strategy | Description | Suitable For |
|---|---|---|
| Customer-based | customer ID hash によって Cell を割り当て | SaaS multi-tenant |
| Region-based | geographic location によって partition | Global services |
| Capacity-based | capacity に達したら新しい Cell を作成 | 均等な load distribution |
| Tier-based | service tier による Cell | Premium/Standard differentiation |
Namespace-based Cell Implementation
# Cell A Namespace
apiVersion: v1
kind: Namespace
metadata:
name: cell-a
labels:
cell: a
tier: standard
---
apiVersion: v1
kind: ResourceQuota
metadata:
name: cell-a-quota
namespace: cell-a
spec:
hard:
requests.cpu: "10"
requests.memory: 20Gi
limits.cpu: "20"
limits.memory: 40Gi
pods: "50"
---
apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1
kind: NetworkPolicy
metadata:
name: cell-isolation
namespace: cell-a
spec:
podSelector: {}
policyTypes:
- Ingress
- Egress
ingress:
- from:
- namespaceSelector:
matchLabels:
cell: a
- namespaceSelector:
matchLabels:
role: cell-router
egress:
- to:
- namespaceSelector:
matchLabels:
cell: a
- namespaceSelector:
matchLabels:
role: shared-servicesShuffle Sharding
各 customer をランダムに選択された Cells の組み合わせに割り当てることで、単一 Cell 障害の影響を受ける customers を最小化します。
With 2 Cell combinations from a pool of 8 Cells:
- Customer A → Cell 1, Cell 5
- Customer B → Cell 2, Cell 7
- Customer C → Cell 1, Cell 3
When Cell 1 fails:
- Customer A → Automatically switches to Cell 5 ✅
- Customer B → Not affected ✅
- Customer C → Automatically switches to Cell 3 ✅組み合わせの数: C(8,2) = 28 となり、2人の customers が同じ組み合わせを共有する確率は非常に低くなります。
Level 4: Multi-Cluster / Multi-Region
Architecture Pattern Comparison
| Pattern | RTO | RPO | Cost | Complexity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Active-Active | ~0 | ~0 | 2x+ | 非常に高い |
| Active-Passive | Min~Hours | Minutes | 1.5x | 高い |
| Regional Isolation | N/A | N/A | region ごとに 1x | 中 |
| Hub-Spoke | Minutes | Minutes | 1.3x | 中 |
Multi-Cluster Deployment with ArgoCD ApplicationSet
apiVersion: argoproj.io/v1alpha1
kind: ApplicationSet
metadata:
name: web-app-set
namespace: argocd
spec:
generators:
# Cluster Generator: Based on cluster labels
- clusters:
selector:
matchLabels:
environment: production
template:
metadata:
name: 'web-app-{{name}}'
spec:
project: default
source:
repoURL: https://github.com/org/k8s-manifests.git
targetRevision: main
path: 'apps/web-app/overlays/{{metadata.labels.region}}'
destination:
server: '{{server}}'
namespace: web-app
syncPolicy:
automated:
prune: true
selfHeal: trueGlobal Accelerator Integration
# Create Global Accelerator
aws globalaccelerator create-accelerator \
--name prod-accelerator \
--ip-address-type IPV4
# Add endpoint groups (each region)
aws globalaccelerator create-endpoint-group \
--listener-arn $LISTENER_ARN \
--endpoint-group-region ap-northeast-2 \
--endpoint-configurations "EndpointId=$NLB_ARN_APNE2,Weight=50" \
--health-check-path /healthzIstio Multi-Primary Federation
# Cross-cluster service discovery
apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1
kind: ServiceEntry
metadata:
name: web-app-remote
spec:
hosts:
- web-app.default.svc.cluster.local
location: MESH_INTERNAL
ports:
- number: 80
name: http
protocol: HTTP
resolution: DNS
endpoints:
- address: web-app.remote-cluster.example.com
locality: us-west-2/us-west-2a
ports:
http: 80Chaos Engineering
Chaos Engineering は system weaknesses を proactive に発見するため、production environments で意図的に障害を注入する methodology です。
AWS Fault Injection Service (FIS)
{
"description": "AZ Failure Simulation",
"targets": {
"eks-pods": {
"resourceType": "aws:eks:pod",
"selectionMode": "ALL",
"parameters": {
"clusterIdentifier": "production-cluster",
"namespace": "default",
"selectorType": "labelSelector",
"selectorValue": "app=web-app"
}
}
},
"actions": {
"delete-pods": {
"actionId": "aws:eks:pod-delete",
"parameters": {},
"targets": { "Pods": "eks-pods" }
}
},
"stopConditions": [
{
"source": "aws:cloudwatch:alarm",
"value": "arn:aws:cloudwatch:ap-northeast-2:123456789012:alarm:error-rate-high"
}
]
}Litmus Chaos (CNCF Incubating)
apiVersion: litmuschaos.io/v1alpha1
kind: ChaosEngine
metadata:
name: pod-delete-chaos
namespace: default
spec:
appinfo:
appns: default
applabel: app=web-app
appkind: deployment
chaosServiceAccount: litmus-admin
experiments:
- name: pod-delete
spec:
components:
env:
- name: TOTAL_CHAOS_DURATION
value: "30"
- name: CHAOS_INTERVAL
value: "10"
- name: FORCE
value: "false"Chaos Mesh
apiVersion: chaos-mesh.org/v1alpha1
kind: NetworkChaos
metadata:
name: network-delay
spec:
action: delay
mode: all
selector:
namespaces:
- default
labelSelectors:
app: web-app
delay:
latency: "100ms"
jitter: "50ms"
correlation: "25"
duration: "5m"Game Day Framework
| Phase | Activity | Deliverable |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Record Steady State | metric baselines を収集 | Dashboard snapshot |
| 2. Inject Failure | FIS/Litmus experiments を実行 | Experiment logs |
| 3. Observe Recovery | automatic recovery process を監視 | recovery time measurement |
| 4. Analyze Impact | error rate、latency changes を分析 | Impact report |
| 5. Post-mortem Review | improvements、Action Items を特定 | Improvement plan |
Implementation Checklist
Level 1 Basic
- [ ] すべての containers に Liveness/Readiness Probe を設定する
- [ ] Resource requests/limits を設定する
- [ ] PodDisruptionBudget を構成する
- [ ] Graceful shutdown (preStop hook) を実装する
- [ ] 適切な terminationGracePeriodSeconds を設定する
Level 2 Multi-AZ
- [ ] Pod Topology Spread Constraints を適用する
- [ ] Karpenter NodePool で 3 AZ distribution を構成する
- [ ] StorageClass で
WaitForFirstConsumerを設定する - [ ] ARC Zonal Shift を有効化する
- [ ] Cross-AZ traffic costs を監視する
Level 3 Cell-Based
- [ ] Cell boundaries (Namespace または Cluster) を定義する
- [ ] Cell Router を実装する
- [ ] NetworkPolicy で Cells を分離する
- [ ] Shuffle Sharding を実装する
- [ ] Cell ごとに ResourceQuota を設定する
Level 4 Multi-Region
- [ ] Multi-Region architecture pattern を決定する
- [ ] Global Accelerator を構成する
- [ ] ArgoCD ApplicationSet で multi-cluster を deploy する
- [ ] data replication strategy を確立する
- [ ] GitOps との consistency を維持する
Cost Considerations
| Item | Cost Impact | Cost Reduction Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-Region Active-Active | single region と比較して 2x+ | Active-Passive で Passive を 50-70% 削減 |
| Cross-AZ Traffic | $0.01/GB (同一 region 内) | Locality-aware routing で 60-80% 削減 |
| Spot Instance | On-Demand と比較して 60-90% savings | stateless workloads に適用 |
| Chaos Engineering | FIS experiment costs | failure prevention による ROI |
Next Steps
- EKS Advanced Debugging and Incident Response
- EKS High Availability Quiz
- Istio Service Mesh - Circuit Breaker, Retry Deep Dive